Tweeter button
Facebook button
Reddit button
Delicious button
Digg button
Stumbleupon button

nick johnson Archive

2010 FANTASY BASEBALL PREVIEW: FIRST BASE

Albert Pujols is #1 in our fantasy baseball first baseman rankings

First base in fantasy baseball is traditionally a position used for premier power hitters. Here’s what I wrote about first basemen last year:

The top 5 starters at this position are typically gone before the end of the 2nd round. When all is said and done, a starting first baseman that gets .300/30/100 will have a neutral to slightly negative effect on your overall stats. First base has to be the foundation of your power production.

Last year, only 25 major leaguers hit more than 30 home runs. Of those 25 players, 12 are eligible to play 1B in Yahoo Fantasy Sports. Last year, 26 players had 100 RBI or more with 13 of them being first basemen. This isn’t a position where being eligible at multiple positions is advantageous. There’s no reason to pick a versatile guy (like Jeff Kent 2 years ago) because they’re undoubtedly more valuable at any position other than 1B.

Not much has changed between 2009 and 2010. First base is still a position where you need to load up on power or risk having to find it elsewhere. Andy Behrens of Yahoo did a similar summary of 2009’s first basemen based on last year’s stats and he noted the following:

  • Nineteen players with first base eligibility finished within the top 100 in the Yahoo! ranks in 2009
  • Fourteen first basemen hit 30 homers, and another 16 hit at least 20
  • Eleven first basemen finished with both 90 runs and 90 RBIs
  • Five of last year’s top 10 batting averages were posted by first basemen
  • In 2009, the average fantasy line for the top 30 first basemen looked like this: 85 R, 30 HR, 99 RBI, 4 SB, .285 AVG.

To put it bluntly, you’re screwed if you don’t have a good first baseman. That’s not to say that you can’t find a bargain. But attempting to wait on a sleeper first baseman can burn a fantasy owner worse than almost anything else. That’s why we’ve ranked the top first basemen along with noting potential sleepers and busts.

READ THE FULL POST »

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

UNNECESSARILY DEFENDING THE NICK JOHNSON SIGNING

New Yankees Nick Johnson and Curtis Granderson

Last week, the Yankees inked Nick Johnson to a one-year deal. He’ll likely DH, fill in at first base, and hit second fairly often. At first glance, it seems like a great signing. However, the acquisition of Nick the Stick wasn’t universally praised. It’s ridiculous that we feel the need to defend Cashman’s moves — but so-called “fans” have forced the issue.

For some reason, Yankee “fans” love to live in the past. We here at BLS were huge fans of both Johnny Damon and Hideki Matsui. But when Brian Cashman doesn’t re-up a player, there’s a reason. Last year, he was willing to make a splash by signing A.J. Burnett, CC Sabathia, and Mark Teixeira. He also let Bobby Abreu walk and take a significantly discounted contract with the Angels. Yes, Cashman probably overpaid slightly for the Big Three and missed out on a good deal with Abreu. However, Cashman puts an emphasis on dictating terms of negotiation and rarely yields to the market due to desperation. This has become even more evident in the past few months as the Yankees have passed on big money pitchers and seemingly cut loose Matsui and Damon.

It’s an oversimplification to say the Yankees could have had Matsui instead of Johnson. Yes, their contracts will pay them similarly for 2010. Though locking up Johnson probably had more to do with Damon’s salary demands than Matsui’s. Johnson was signed to hit second at least half of the time. That’s because Cashman clearly already knew that Damon was never coming back.

It’s annoying that people are also locked into the 2009 “Bombs Away” mentality. This is a different year and a different team. Cashman lost very little pop in the outfield and upgraded it defensively. Adding Nick Johnson’s absurd OBP is also part of the transition. One has to wonder if the “fans” whining about Matsui and Damon remember the Yankees STILL have one of the all-time great infields. The Yankees may have less comeback wins and walkoff bombs, but that doesn’t mean they’ll be worse off in 2010.

In the big picture, the Yankees will pay the new acquisitions less than the (literally) old team members. Johnson and Granderson also have similar levels of production and are both younger than their counterparts. Here are some additional points to support our argument:

  • Nick Johnson can hit #2 and usually has a great OBP. This lets Granderson hit 5th against righties and lower in the order when the Yankees face a lefty. Last year, Johnson had a .298 average and .433 OBP as a #2 hitter.
  • While Nick Johnson has limited ability to play first base, he can still fill in for Teixeira when he’s not DHing. He started 124 games at first base last year between the Nationals and Marlins. The people complaining about Johnson’s less-than-stellar fielding and injury concerns must also forget that Hideki Matsui only had 456 ABs last year (437 coming as DH) and didn’t play a single game in the outfield. He also only started 116 games.
  • Hideki Matsui will be 36 and Johnny Damon will also be 36 next season. Granderson will be 29 and Johnson will be 31. We should probably copy and paste this one more time at the end just in case it doesn’t sink in.
  • In terms of hitting numbers, Johnson and Granderson are similar (slightly better even) to Matsui and Damon. Johnson and Granderson have a 3-year BA/OBP/SLG/OPS of 0.279, 0.379, 0.485, 0.864 while Matsui and Damon have 0.284, 0.365, 0.463, 0.828. The 5-year averages are slightly better for Matsui and Damon but batting average is still the only category where the older duo is better. You can visit It’s About The Money Stupid for more on this comparison.
  • Joe Girardi can now hit either Nick Johnson or Nick Swisher in the #2 spot. The Yankees will be even more taxing on starters and relievers by seeing a ton of pitches. Yes, Johnny Damon had an excellent 4.06 pitches per at bat. However, Swisher had a massive 4.26 and Nick Johnson had a ridiculous 4.36 pitches per at bat.

To all of you Yankee fans out there: embrace the change. The Yankees aren’t re-building or quitting on 2010. Brian Cashman simply has a plan that you may not fully understand. It’s shocking how many people object to acquiring younger, cheaper players that put up comparable numbers. Please, just leave the general managing to The Cash Man.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Minaya’s Dilemma: Who’s At First?

A week into the season, Ryan Church was raking doubles and Daniel Murphy was the new hotness. Five weeks later, Mets fans are looking at a much different scenario. Church has seemingly fallen out of favor with Jerry Manuel and Murphy has been unacceptably bad in left field.

Daniel Murphy hasnt done it with the bat or glove this season

Daniel Murphy hasn't done it with the bat or glove so far

Many thought that Manuel would use Murphy to spell Delgado at first base and potentially groom him for a future at the position. However, that hasn’t happened. To this point, Daniel Murphy has played 8 innings at first base (with another start coming tonight) and Carlos Delgado is on the DL for at least two months. Manuel has gone to Jeremy Reed in Delgado’s place, who had played all of one inning at first base before this season. Luckily, Sheff is filling in admirably in the field. While that is a positive for the Mets, it also means that the 500 Home Run Club Member will have less in the tank come September and October. What does all of this mean? It means that Omar Minaya needs to make a move sooner rather than later.

Unfortunately for the Mets, it’s not very easy to stumble upon a stud outfielder or first baseman. That being said, it makes the most sense to get a role player at this point. They don’t need to shake up the clubhouse by adding an ego and I also don’t think it’s worth ravaging the farm system for a quick fix. The Mets would be best served acquiring a wait-and-see player that will fill in adequately or that has decent upside. Shooting for the stars will only make the gamble more risky.

THE FRANCESA BUNCH

These are the players that have been mentioned on Francesa’s radio show. I think Nick Johnson is the only guy that he’s latched onto as a candidate. The players listed here are too expensive for the most part. Even so, none of these guys are really a lock for success.

At least Nick Johnson has a pretty swing

At least Nick Johnson has a pretty swing

Mark De Rosa - Chicago Cubs
BLS writer John has already covered De Rosa and I agree with the assessment. He’s a utility player … a very average utility player. The Mets can do better than to pay to get this guy.

Brad HawpeColorado Rockies
I really like Hawpe, but I don’t see how he fixes anything for the Mets. It’s also doubtful that the Rockies would give up their best hitter for any reasonable price.

Garrett AtkinsColorado Rockies
Atkins is solid but unspectacular. He’s even less spectacular outside of Coors with a career .256 average on the road. There’s really no reason for the Mets to target Atkins unless he’s simply filler. Atkins is 29 and he may have already peaked.

Matt HollidayOakland Athletics
Holliday has one year with the A’s to try to max out the value of his next contract. However, he’s yet to prove that he can hit for power outside of Coors. Oakland isn’t a great hitters park, so we’ll give him a pass on the power numbers — for now. In his career year (2007), Holliday slugged a massive .607 with a 1.012 OPS and last year he had a .538 slugging % with a .947 OPS. This year he’s slugging a mere .428 with only 5 doubles (one less than Church, one more than Murphy). So it’s not just the homers that are missing. Holliday might be the worst choice out of all of these players with the highest price and lowest upside.

Adam DunnWashington Nationals
He might actually fit well in the lineup with his big bat and high OBP. He’s an excellent player but a less-than-great target for the Mets. The Nats will want blue chip prospects if they’re going to trade away the only reason for people in DC to come to the park.

Nick JohnsonWashington Nationals
Nick the Stick is no stranger to New York and he’s probably the best fit that I’ve heard mentioned on Francesa. He’s finally healthy after a lost season and is off to one of the best starts in his career. I like Nick Johnson a lot as a target for the Mets since he’s consisent and is relatively low cost in terms of trade value and contract. But don’t look now, the Red Sox (Mike Francesa’s favorite team) have been scouting Johnson. Apparently, they like him as an insurance plan for Kevin Youkilis who has been dealing with the must-have-injury-of-2009: an oblique injury.

BLS PICKS

We like these guys because they’re economical. Who knows… the Mets could even end up with a solid major leaguer out of this group. The common themes here are “cheap” and “versatile”. If Met fans are disappointed with Murphy, I’m even more about backlash if they acquire a player with high expectations.

Chris Duncan would bring a bat, versatility, and a fat lip to NY

Chris Duncan would bring a bat, versatility, and a fat lip to NY

Chad TracyArizona Diamondbacks
Tracy has been pretty close to awful this year, but he has been a very productive player in the past. “Opposite Field Tracy” was hobbled the last couple seasons by injuries to both knees. He’s battled his way back but, at 29, finds himself out of a starting gig. Tracy has started 22 games at 1B this year and started 65 games there last year.

Dallas McPherson - San Francisco Giants
McPherson, a former super prospect, hit 42 bombs in the minors last year after missing 2007 due to back surgery. He’s a third baseman but also has played first in the past. The Mets also could’ve had him for free as he was waived by the Marlins earlier this year. He was subsequently signed by the Giants and will join the Fresno Grizzlies after completing extended spring training. He’s already almost 29, but he’s also a career .296 hitter in the minors with 150 bombs in 2273 ABs. His longest stint in the majors was 61 games in 2004. As long as there aren’t unrealistic expectations, this guy could be a decent substitute for Delgado.

Ryan ShealyKansas City Royals
Much Like McPherson, Shealy is a guy that has always killed in the minors but never really made it to the show. He’s been up and down the past few years and is now essentially been blocked by Billy Butler. Shealy’s scattered stints in the majors pretty much add up to a full season and his numbers are solid. In 164 career games, he’s hit 19 homers with 94 RBI with a .271 average and has only committed 5 errors. Shealy turns 30 in August.

Billy ButlerKansas City Royals
It would probably be tough to get Butler from the Royals since they’re kinda sorta in the hunt (for now). He’s also one of the few productive offensive players on KC and is only 23. It’s unlikely that he’s available or his price tag is probably too high, but he could be a good fit for the Mets.

Chris DuncanSt. Louis Cardinals
Duncan’s back problems seem to be behind him and he’s a guy with pretty good power. He’s never been a full-time first basemen but does play the position. He also plays outfield and that flexibility will come in handy if/when Delgado returns from the DL. The Cards have been rotating 4 outfielders (Rasmus, Ludwick, Ankiel, Duncan) so he could be a bargain.

CONCLUSION

I’m hopeful that Minaya will pursue one of the low-risk, high-reward options. The way I see it, the Mets need a player for the next two months that will be decent but not great. I actually don’t see Delgado coming back to play full time even when he returns from the DL.  So the best fit would be a player who could learn from Delgado while splitting time with him in the last couple months of the season (and potentially into 2010).

The price tag and the potential for (perceived) failure is too high with a star-level player. For that reason, the Mets must seek a bargain. I think the ideal scenario for the Mets would be to acquire a player like Russell Branyan for practically nothing. Shealy and McPherson are a lot like him. Branyan languished as a strike-out prone power hitter that got his shot with a near full-time gig in 2001. The Indians decided that his 294 Ks in 807 plate appearances were too much to stomach and was dealt to Cincinnati for Ben Broussard. Six teams and seven years later, the 34 year old Branyan is hitting .310 with 10 homers for Seattle. Similarly, Carlos Pena also didn’t break out until he was 29. Obviously, these are best case scenarios and it’s unlikely that the Mets’ situation will pan out this way. There are also options like Duncan and Tracy who are flexible and have been good hitters in the past. Acquiring a player like that gives the Mets more flexibility down the line with the potential for a pleasant surprise.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,